Why Civil Resistance Works, Erica Chenoweth
January 21, 2012 at 7:41 pm | Posted in General Peace | Leave a commentTags: Erica Chenoweth, University of Dayton
The current University of Dayton alumni magazine features an essay by Erica Chenoweth, Ph.D., Class of 2002. She discusses how she was inspired to research and write her 2011 book, Why Civil Resistance Works. Link to that:
http://echenoweth.faculty.wesleyan.edu/wcrw/
Chenoweth studies international conflicts, and writes that prior to 2006 she believed that nonviolent resistance “was weak and generally ineffective;” but after studying civil resistance movements in depth, she has come to believe that nonviolent campaigns for change “were more than twice as effective as violent ones.” (I cannot link to the article itself, yet — UD has not put it online. They do put the alumni magazine online eventually, but not this issue yet.)
Perhaps this book can be taught . . . at UD!! A guy can hope. Anyway, well done, UD alumni magazine; terrific article.
A Maverick Marianist university – part 2
January 5, 2012 at 2:39 am | Posted in UDRI | Leave a commentTags: marianists, UDRI, University of Dayton
The University of Dayton has obtained military contracts to work on the Maverick missile. I have mentioned this before; here is some updated information.
Here’s everything you’ve ever wanted to know about the Maverick missile:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/agm-65.htm
The Maverick is a weapon. (Did you know that people still wonder, apparently, whether or not UD works on weapons? Despite everything I’ve written about the Minuteman III nuclear missile, these Mavericks, etc.? I can tell from the search engine terms they use to get to this blog. It’s amazing.)
Anyway, the site GovernmentContractsWon.com:
http://www.governmentcontractswon.com/department/defense/university_of_dayton_073134025.asp?yr=10
- mentions that UD has done contracting for the Maverick worth $1.2 million since 2007. (You can get that figure only if you pay the twenty bucks for the full data download, which I did.)
And that’s only the contracts that have information in the “weapons system” column; most of the contracts at UD (and probably everywhere else doing this stuff, I assume) say “not discernable” or “classified” in that column. So all of UD’s “classified” contracts could be . . . who knows. My guess is that a lot of them are for robot-nanomissiles, or perhaps nano-robotmissiles.
Meanwhile, the University of Toledo makes headlines for its research on solar power:
“The company has a 5,000-square-foot manufacturing operation on the campus of the University of Toledo, which provided venture-capital funding to Nextronex and has an incubator offering business services to alternative-energy startups.”
The forever drone war
December 18, 2011 at 5:12 pm | Posted in General Peace | Leave a commentTags: Chalmers Johnson, drone war, drones, Paul D. Miller
Cutting back on our drone bombings around the world does not seem to be a priority for anyone, nor something that many people want to discuss. I was glad to see Paul D. Miller, who was National Security Council director for Afghanistan from 2007 to 2009, write an op-ed titled “When will the U.S. drone war end?” in the Washington Post on November 17:
“But bombing by drone is also an act of war that kills people. And wars are supposed to end. They have to have an end. Endless war is unacceptable and dangerous. The U.S. government simply cannot arrogate the right to wage an endless, global war against anyone it deems a threat to national security. The prospect of such a war should trouble anyone who has the least acquaintance with history or political philosophy.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/when-will-the-us-drone-war-end/2011/11/15/gIQAZ677VN_story.html
It’s good someone with his mainstream credibility is saying this. I would be more critical of the drone bombings than he is (surprise); for example, Miller says:
“It is clear that drones need to be in the skies for some years yet.”
“Some years” in these matters can mean 50 years, 60 years – much longer than he may be thinking. Really. I mean it. We’ve had troops in Germany for 66 years now, after WWII, right? And when we took over the Philippines in 1898, we stayed as a ruling occupying force for 48 years (the nation was granted independence in 1946). Americans do not like to learn from history, but there it is. If we nod along as Miller says “some more years” for drone bombings, that can be decades. Occupations — in this case, an occupation of airspace — take on an inertia and do not end easily.
Also, Miller does not point out specifically that in wars, people die on both sides; and that means that, in this drone war, Americans may die. The people we are bombing may retaliate, somehow. Miller writes that drone bombings have become “almost . . . risk free;” and I’m afraid we are forgetting that there will be blowback (just as Chalmers Johnson predicted, correctly, about our occupations abroad).
The people we are drone-bombing are going to kick us in the teeth someday! And unless people who have qualms about the drone war work to stop it, its inertia will allow it to continue for the rest of our lives!
There you are, America. You needed to hear that.
Veterans Day story: Homeless veterans
November 10, 2011 at 5:03 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a commentTags: veterans day, veterans day story
Americans support their troops during wars; but then years later—or months later!—when some of those veterans are homeless, attitudes change . . . our national consensus is that people who make poor choices, or who get unlucky, should sleep outdoors or in their cars.
My day job is in affordable housing, so I pay attention to this. Many veterans really are homeless. Here is a group that advocates for them:
And here are a few stories of actual homeless veterans:
http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/coming-home-homeless-homeless-veterans/story?id=12478952
There’s a children’s story of a veteran who was lucky enough not to be homeless — my grandfather — on the Peace Stories for Children page.
University of Dayton: $3.2 million in nuclear missile systems contracts since our last episode
November 4, 2011 at 5:45 pm | Posted in UDRI | 1 CommentTags: marianists, ud minuteman iii, ud nuclear weapons, UDRI, university dayton minuteman iii, university of dayton nuclear weapons
Last September (Sept. 2010) I wrote about a contract or contracts that UD had obtained to maintain the Minuteman III nuclear missile system. An official of the UD Research Institute, quoted in the Dayton Daily News on 8/20/2010, mentioned one contract worth $30 million over five years.
These contracts are listed on a web site, www.governmentcontractswon.com, which compiles public information. I say “contracts” because it lists several dozen of them for UD under the Minuteman III Propulsion Replacement Program (PRP). However, some of the amounts of these contracts are small, or even $0, so perhaps they are smaller pieces of that $30 million total.
According to GlobalSecurity.org, the PRP –
“will extend the life of the Minuteman III operational force by replacing the solid propellant propulsion subsystems.”
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/budget/fy2001/dot-e/airforce/01minuteman.html
In Sept. 2010, the most recent contract for UD’s nuclear missile work listed on the Government Contracts Won site was from 10/15/2008. Government Contracts Won now lists 25 PRP contracts at UD from 2009 and 2010, which total just over $3.2 million. (There are hundreds of government contracts listed, for UD, and the vast majority do not mention a specific weapons system; rather, they just say “not discernable” or “not discernable or classified” in the “weapons system” column. Many of these could also be related to the PRP, of course.)
(This time I paid the twenty bucks for the data download . . . that download lists more amounts than the basic information on their site does.)
Again, folks, the Minuteman III force is The Big One; 450 missiles in silos ready to launch at a moment’s notice and kill a billion people . . . riding atop propellant systems brought to you by the University of Dayton—in the Marianist tradition.
| Contract Dollar Amount | * | ||
| Defense Dept Contract IDs/Numbers | * | ||
| Product/Service | Rdte/Aircraft-Applied Research | ||
| Government Contracting Office | FA8650 DET 1 AFRL PK | Principal Place of Performance | Dayton, Ohio (Montgomery County) |
| Claimant Program | OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT | ||
| Weapon System | MINUTEMAN III PRP | ||
| From Date | 11/17/2009 | To Date | 8/2/2010 |
See also:
http://peacegarret.wordpress.com/2010/08/30/my-alma-mater-can-wipe-your-alma-mater-off-the-map/
Jewelry made from disarmed nuclear weapons systems
October 29, 2011 at 5:21 pm | Posted in General Peace | Leave a commenthttp://www.fromwartopeace.com/
This organization sells jewelry made from materials recycled from weapons systems . . . awesome.
Vatican’s ambassador to the UN speaks out against nuclear weapons
July 18, 2011 at 1:33 am | Posted in UDRI | Leave a commentTags: ud minuteman iii, ud nuclear weapons, university dayton minuteman iii, university of dayton nuclear weapons
Archbishop Francis Chullikatt, the Vatican’s ambassador to the United Nations, spoke out against nuclear weapons a few days ago (July 16) in Kansas City.
‘He said Catholic teaching has always emphasized the need to make the world safe from nuclear weapons, “not to make the world safer through the threat of nuclear weapons.” ‘ – as reported in the Catholic Chronicle of the Diocese of Toledo.
Link:
The University of Dayton, a Catholic university, has worked on at least three contracts over the past several years, worth at least $30 million, to maintain the Minuteman III nuclear missile system. There is more information about this in previous posts here on this blog.
I attended UD and I do not think it is appropriate for my alma mater to maintain nuclear weapons. If the Catholic Church wants less emphasis on nuclear weapons, it could start by having its universities abstain from working on them.
I like to post items like these quotes from Archbishop Chullikatt to demonstrate that this is a genuine and current issue for many, as I like to call them, Important People in the Church.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.


